Why silence happens

Silence around abuse is rarely accidental. It is produced — by shame, by the social cost of disclosure, by authority figures who benefit from it continuing, and sometimes by a theology that reframes accountability as a failure of Christian virtue.

Understanding how silence is manufactured is not a theoretical exercise. It is the difference between a survivor who believes their silence is a personal failing and one who recognises it as the intended outcome of a system designed to protect itself.

What silence does

When abuse is not named, it continues. When institutions respond to disclosure with dismissal, the person who spoke pays the social cost — not the person who caused harm. When communities ostracise those who try to report, they teach everyone watching that silence is the price of belonging.

The consequences compound over time. Children who experience or witness abuse in environments where silence is enforced internalise that silence as normal. They carry it into adult life as the default response to harm — not because they chose it, but because every signal they received confirmed it was the only safe option.

This is not a failure of individual courage. It is the predictable result of systems that protect themselves at the expense of the people inside them.

Silence

If you have been told to stay quiet, or tried to speak and found yourself punished for it — this page is about that.

Local testimony — Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse

The testimony linked below was submitted to the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Case Study 36: Church of England Boys' Society. It was given by Richard Johnson Kells, a member of the Christ Church St Ives congregation, on 25 January 2016.

It documents, in precise chronological detail, what happened when a community member in the Hornsby and Ku-ring-gai area repeatedly attempted to report suspected child sexual abuse within a church-connected boys' organisation between approximately 1977 and 1989.

The testimony records:

Three witnessed incidents involving a CEBS leader and junior boys, including finding the leader in bed with a child at a camp.

A mother's disclosure that her son came home from a swimming trip wearing underpants that were not his, which the leader had helped him put on.

The Branch Governor's explicit instruction to stay silent: "we are short of leaders and I am loathe to rock the boat. I ask you not to speak about this again or to anyone else."

Bishop Clive Kerle, after being told the full picture, counselling the witness to be forgiving: "Richard, try to be forgiving and give Simon a second chance."

A police statement made in the 1980s that was left unsigned, undated, and apparently not investigated.

The ostracism of the witness and his wife from the St Ives congregation after he raised concerns. Not the leader — the person who tried to speak.

Criminal proceedings did not occur until 2009.

That is not an aberration. That is the pattern.

Read the full testimony: Testimony

The theology that enables it

The responses documented in that testimony — stay silent, be forgiving, give a second chance — are not merely bureaucratic failures. They are theologically coherent applications of doctrines that, in the wrong hands, function as instruments of cover-up.

Forgiveness is a Christian virtue. But forgiveness weaponised — deployed to pressure survivors not to report, to rehabilitate perpetrators without accountability, to frame disclosure as a spiritual failure of the person who was harmed — is not forgiveness. It is a mechanism for protecting the institution.

Authority is a Christian concept. But authority captured by self-preservation — where the functioning of the organisation matters more than the safety of its children — has abandoned the purpose that justifies its existence.

These patterns are not unique to one Anglican boys' group in St Ives. They are documented at the institutional scale.

In 2022, Guidepost Solutions published its independent investigation into the Southern Baptist Convention — the largest Protestant denomination in the United States. The nearly 300-page report found that for over two decades, SBC leaders had routinely silenced and disparaged abuse survivors, maintained internal lists of accused ministers without acting on them, and prioritised protecting the institution from legal liability over the safety of children. Survivors who came forward were, in the report's words, "ignored, disbelieved, or met with the constant refrain that the SBC could take no action." The report covered only the period from 2000 to 2021 — and identified nearly 700 credibly accused individuals.

This is not history. It is current practice in significant parts of organised Christianity, including movements with growing influence in Australia.

The Kells testimony is local evidence of a global failure. The failure has a mechanism. The mechanism has a theology behind it. That theology is being examined elsewhere on this site.

The 49 Theses

Religious Abuse

If this page reflects something familiar

If you have been silenced, pressured to forgive before you were ready, or found yourself ostracised for trying to speak — you are not alone, and what happened to you was not your fault.

HKSG is not a crisis service. What we can do is listen, without pressure and without agenda.

If you are in immediate danger, call 000. For confidential support: 1800 RESPECT — 1800 737 732 (24 hours)

Hornsby Ku-Ring-Gai Survivors Group Inc.
A registered Australian charity
ABN 54 883 981 332